My first instinct when I saw ‘New York City’ and ‘Beehives’ was that the connector was a geographical or structural category. I was convinced the answer was something like ‘Things with boroughs’ since NYC has them and beehives have brood chambers, which are a type of compartment. It felt like a solid start. Then ‘Playing cards’ appeared. I thought, ‘Okay, a deck has suits, so that fits the idea of sub-divisions.’ I was still leaning into my initial theory.
But then ‘Chess sets’ came up, and the theory completely fell apart. Chess has pieces, not compartments. My brain stuttered. I tried to force it, thinking maybe it was about ‘Things with distinct groups,’ but it felt incredibly loose. That’s when I stopped thinking about abstract categories and actually looked at the words. *New York City… Queen… Beehives… Queen Bee… Playing cards… Queen of Hearts…* It all clicked at once. I hadn’t even considered a simple word-in-common pattern because the first two clues felt so grand.
Once I saw it, I knew the answer had to be ‘Things that contain ‘Queens’.’ The final clue, ‘LinkedIn Games,’ was just a perfect confirmation, knowing the creator’s name. Here’s the full breakdown:
New York City → Contains the borough of Queens, one of the five boroughs of NYC.
Beehives → Contain the Queen Bee, the sole egg-laying female in the colony.
Playing cards → Contain the Queen card, typically ranking below the King.
Chess sets → Contain the Queen piece, the most powerful piece on the board.
LinkedIn Games → Created by the Queens, NY-based team at LinkedIn.
The ‘click’ moment wasn’t about complex logic, but about shifting my focus from what the things *are* to what their names *contain*. It was a great reminder that sometimes the simplest connection is the right one, hiding right in front of you.